Skip to content

Quick Shots

June 23, 2011

A few quick items:

L. A. Noire is in the books, now, and I’m quite torn about the game. To be blunt: the only reason I stayed with the game after the halfway point was my interest in the characters & seeing what became of them. There is precious little gameplay on offer here, and most of it is railroaded and overly simplistic. It’s said that L.A.Noire is a throwback to adventure mystery games of old, but the ones I remember were fairly open-ended. The player chose where to go, who to interview, and who to accuse. L.A.Noire leads you by the nose, step-by-step; the right destination in the game is infallibly the next destination in your notebook. The game’s claim to fame – the interrogating of suspects – is a great story device and impressive tech demo, but staggeringly easy. Think I’m wrong? Apply the following strategy. First, is the person someone clearly unimportant to the case, other than a minor witness? If the answer is no, then exclude the “Truth” option. Does the person shift their eyes or head at all after responding, or look at you smugly? Pick between “Doubt” and “Lie” based on the following 100% accurate formula: look at your notebook; if you have a clue that will directly contradict the person’s statement, pick lie; otherwise, pick doubt. And that’s it.

Shadows of the Damned is a wonderful, satisfying, hilarious romp that provides gameplay in spades. If you like Robert Rodriguez movies, check it out.

Dungeons & Dragons is in trouble, in my opinion. 4th Edition has many good ideas, but two key failings: (1) it’s awash in complexity, and (2) it discarded all the unique, fluffy trappings that gave D&D its special flavor in favor. It is a mechanically competent if bland cocktail right now, that results in hour-long combats and a loss of the dungeon-crawl feel of old. Mages, in particular, have been gutted, with their odd and eclectic spell lists discarded in favor of a system that merely tells you how many dice to roll. A shame. A series of articles on wizards.com/dnd suggests that WotC is aware of the problem, but how will they address it? A system that simplified & streamlined the combat rules, returned mages to their old, flavorful state, and recaptured the lost essence of the past would be ideal.  (As a side note, much of what I think doesn’t work in 4th E is driven by the mandatory miniatures/grid combat. Now that WotC is out of the miniatures business, perhaps they will return to the abstracted combat of previous editions? I don’t want to manage attacks of opportunity, grid movement, or the like. I want to declare something like “I do a somersault over the head of the guards and attack the evil priest!”, and roll a few dice to see how that turns out.)

Advertisement
3 Comments leave one →
  1. Kermit permalink
    June 24, 2011 12:15 am

    Disappointed to hear that about L.A. Noire. Was looking forward to it.

    • Jeff permalink*
      June 24, 2011 11:16 am

      I hate to say this, but unless you want to hop on board for 21 hours based on story alone, it’s probably best to skip. It’s quite a good story – with a questionable ending – and thus why I am conflicted. Had the game been 10 hours shorter I might have been more forgiving.

  2. enesyuu permalink
    October 3, 2011 11:13 am

    I can’t believe Noire didn’t have multiple endings! Most games like that tend to have that feature to encourage replayability. So I guess Noire is more akin to Phoenix Wright than Heavy Rain. Although I could see myself replaying a Phoenix Wright game eventually, as they tend to be zany (endearing) and MUCH shorter. I’m not sure the same could be said of Noire…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.